![]() The text I posted isn’t intended to disprove the existence of God, it points out the fallacy of that supposed “proof” of the existence of God. But it’s strange that the “proofs” of God’s existence seem to rely upon the lack of answers to questions nobody even knew to ask 100 years or so ago. Answering a question raises more questions, which gives the God of the Gaps plenty of room for retreat, so this argument will probably never be resolved. Someone else on another thread referred to so-called scientific or rationalistic “proofs” of the existence of God as “the God of the Gaps.” “Science can’t explain this, therefore science will NEVER be able to explaint this, therefore the only explanation is God.” Luckily for the theists, every door that science opens seems to reveal other doors we hadn’t even known existed before. But we know a hell of a lot more now than we did 100 years ago, and I have no doubt we’ll know a hell of a lot more in another 100 years, even though I won’t be around to see it. It’s true that my understanding is limited by the capacity of the human brain, and it’s also true that our understanding of the phenomena involved in the origins of the universe is in its infancy. God exists outside of the Natural Order which allows God to exist outside of the Natural Order which is how we know God exists outside of the Natural Order. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |